KIPAC Seminar: Model Predictive Scoring Shows Specific BAO Observations Drive w0wa Tension
Event Details:
Location
Abstract: The recent analyses of DESI DR2 BAO, Planck CMB and various Supernovae datasets have shown preferences for evolving dark energy at various levels of significance, under frequentist model comparison tests. However, the same analysis done with a pure Bayesian model comparison test can lead to the opposite conclusion due to the impact of w0wa priors. In contrast to these in-sample model comparison route, we approach the problem along a third axis -- which model better predicts unseen data. We use the Expected Log Predictive Density (ELPD) metric to score the predictiveness of ΛCDM and w0waCDM models. The comparison metric ΔELPD is out-of-sample, unlike Δχ2MAP and Bayes Factor, and insensitive to prior width, unlike the Bayes factor. Aggregated, we find modest preferences for w0waCDM, primarily driven by the BAO. Decomposing the ΔELPD score by redshift we find that a single BAO block, LRG2 (z=0.706), supplies the entire BAO preference. Interestingly, the biggest outlier point, LRG1, contributes little to the model predictive scoring because both ΛCDM and w0waCDM fail to predict the observation by equal amount. On the other hand, all SNIa datasets' ΔELPD scores are consistent with 0 in the LRG bins, indicating that at an out-of-distribution predictive level, the w0waCDM tension is driven by one BAO point.
Related Topics
Explore More Events
KIPAC Tea Talk: Quasi-periodic eruptions: a new probe of supermassive black holes and extreme mass-ratio inspirals / The Origin of Supermassive Black Holes from Pop III.1 Seeds and Implications for Particle Physics and Cosmology
Joheen Chakraborty (MIT) / Jonathan Tan (Chalmers / U. Virginia)Campus, PAB 102/103-SLAC, Kavli 3rd Floor Conf. RoomAstrophysics Colloquium: Our Galaxy’s Dynamic Center
Cara Battersby (University of Connecticut)Campus, PAB 102/103-Campus, PAB 102/103